Astounding results. Again.

Another 100% accuracy and with striking sharpness. The third day of testing (Friday 6th november) extended to 21 actions: we had outperforming results, absolutely astounding: 100% precision, no false at all.
We cannot find similar results in literature any far. Resarchers usually reach 90% at their best with only 3-5 actions [see the survey of Bao MIT 2003, still valid in terms of results survey]; and the majority do not even try with 10-12 actions, and who try surely do not reach the 100% . Using 21 action having 100% accuracy , is a really great and impressive performance, expecially because the method do not use any kind of biomechanical model or any a priori knowledge for signals analysis . It is a general method: we can easily extend it at will, and use it in many different contexts, without introducing any domain specific knowledge.

Note: We have already exausted all our dictionary for tests (a total of 252 actions!) in three try because we did not expect to reach a so sharp and net performance at the first shot.

Congratulations
Stefano, dott. Pinardi

----------------------------------------
dott. S.Pinardi
Nomadislab dept. of Computer Science
University of Milano Bicocca
Milan, Italy
----------------------------------------

[Italian translation]
Risultati eclatanti, ancora.

Ancora 100% accuracy e di una nitidezza eclatante.
Il terzo gg di test (venerdì) esteso a 21 azioni, dà risultati outperforming, risultati assolutamente sbalorditivi. Non esistono in letteratura risultati neanche lontanamente analoghi: la ricerca arriva nel migliore dei casi al 90% con sole 3-5 azioni da riconoscere e appena sopra queste cardinalità (10-12 azioni) già annaspa...